No, I was going to actually quick after battling LAWD, tbh. Had to force myself in to even write for KON.
*Quit.
@fresh
I guess its Me Vs @Salamander or @KnowP .
Yup, good luck.
What doesn't make sense? I have no interest in the belt, but wanna battle when I want to. LolOriginally Posted by Sicc
Makes perfect sense. I may have a change of heart though.
I'm gonna set up the next match by tomorrow. It would be u vs pg let me know.What doesn't make sense? I have no interest in the belt, but wanna battle when I want to. Lol
Makes perfect sense. I may have a change of heart though.
So... People get to battle and have the choice to battle for the title, if they have the points?
That's what you are saying? Lol
Makes sense...
How he has PTS so that comment is irrelevant.
You are irrelevant. You obviously didn't understand he question.
I said; IF YOU HAVE THE POINTS, you are able to decide whether you want a title shot or not?
Are we clear now? Lol...
Example:
Champ: Abcdef
Runner up: Hijk w/98 Pts.
Hijk is up for a champ match but can decline it, but still battle others? Get me now? That's basically what Sal is doing which is fine by any means. Just asking for some clarity here.
I hate boarding from this damn iPhone 5, lol.
If he was champ that would be corny but to battle & not want the title shot that's by choice which is ok by any means.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing.
I mean, I WANT to come off the burner & battle PG.. but I'd end up vacating the belt again if I won. What's the point?
I feel you. Just wanted to know. In case I wanted to return and considering I would probably be leading in points (after I KO Kon) I don't want another title shot, but rather battle as I please here and there, dig? Kind of like what you are doing.
Cause @miracle stated you couldn't ask to be placed on the back burner, that's only for those who haven't battled in weeks, or some shit. Unless I misread that post? Just looking for some clarity, that is all. There is obviously a gray area of confusion, lol.
Posting Rules
