(2-1)Pavonia vs (1-1)3Bet[Open For Votes]

[Donald Trump]

Due Dates
Matches set Sunday night.
Check-Ins due Tuesday midnight
Punches due Thursday midnight
Voting concludes Sunday 9pm
(all times pacific)

Voting
Everyone is required to vote on EVERY battle.
1 vote deduction for every battle link missed.
Failure to meet quota results in 1 week boot.
Failure to meet voting quota twice times results in 2 week boot.
Failure to meet voting quota 3 times results in boot remainder of season/playoffs.
Only votes from 1-2 Punch season 23 participants will count.
Non 1-2 punch votes will be allowed as feedback but will not count towards final tally.
Example of an acceptable vote:

Smog n Let in the finals ? Someone loan a punch cos these cats really need one.
I'll hit these faggots w/ so many fly kicks - the new Jordan's 6's'll have a nation wide refund.
-I thought this was cool, at first I thought it was a reach with the punch/kick reference. But I think the Jordan 6/finals reference was cool. I just think the wordin' on this was pretty bad.

Smog wears the pants. He maid ill his bitch but chances of offspring are kinda slim
Unless he wants to see decrease in his genes...every night when Kay's done ironing them
-Nice, I like the maid/bitch work slap that you hit kay with lol. but I don't think you really dissed smog. you kinda big upped him lol.

These faggot fucks ain't felt, it's obvious along the ways some massive luck was dealt...
When all it takes is knuckles to silence letter K.... or anybody tryna grab or touch my belt...
-I think you shoulda spelled out Kay, but other than that I thought this was nice.


I think smog got this. Kay had bad wording. So it was between Letterman and Smog to me. And Letterman didn't really diss Smog with his punch imo.

Vote - Smog

Example of an Unacceptable vote:

v/kid

i thought letter was choppy.. n smogs bar got little choppy toward the end..with saying 'or' twice

Battle Rules
Punches must be dropped AFTER both participants check in.
Failure to check in on time will result in loss and battler will be replaced in the battle.
NO EXTENSIONS. It's only 1 bar.
NO editing punches after your opponent drops
Biting will result is league/site ban.
Recycling will result in DQ and league ban.

@3bet @PAVONIA

[3bet]

Check

[PAVONIA]

Check

[Donald Trump]

Ready for blind drops

[3bet]

yall put a pitbull vs a poodle, this posh bitch isnt fit for the zoo
so If anyone thinking Pav a rottie.. opera's what they're listening too.


goodluck

[PAVONIA]

Last week this geek got KO'ed, now this man is flinching...
Fitting how my punch put'em 'back in a daze' without a second of reminiscing!

[Attack of the Muff]

3bet- u lucky I heard rottweilers being called rottys b4 lol

But I like the wp..thought it was pretty clever n done smoothly


PAv-great execution on a terribly played concept

Daze/days is old man

Simplistic..n obvious similar to sweet (suite);wordplay

OOPS VOT FOR 3BET

[Not N Nice]

The winner gets this one due to clarity...
Both had some decent content, but,
Although I knew the pav/rottweiler shit right away
The somewhat obscurity of delivery kinda irks it
Which gives pav the upperhand for more "direct" sting mvgt pav

[Coup.]

pav a rotti was cool not very hard hitting but still a creative nameplay set up worked w it


daze/days has been played for yrs an urs didn't have a fresh twist or angle


bet

[alphadog]

yall put a pitbull vs a poodle, this posh bitch isnt fit for the zoo
so If anyone thinking Pav a rottie.. opera's what they're listening too

Lol this was funny, could've been dope if more effort was put into it but it stands as a nice punch as is, np flip was cool


Last week this geek got KO'ed, now this man is flinching...
Fitting how my punch put'em 'back in a daze' without a second of reminiscing!

This was ok a bit stretched an wording was off as was the rhyme scheme, nothing really creative here

Mvgt 3bet

[Flying Carcass]

3bet - nah man I'm so sick and tired of people trying wack nameplays oh this pavilion o nigga like come on son!!!! First of all it's pronounced pave-oh-knee-uh, so everyone who's been saying PAV as in pahv is incorrect which makes the name play inaccurate. Barcotics didn't work, coups didn't work (even though he still won) and this didn't work. You dropped some good shit last week against arch, I even voted your way against the odds but here this isn't cutting it.

Pavilion o - you still gotta work on how you execute your punches and concepts, you have the concepts down packed but the way you execute them isn't really making it a harsh punch and that's what we're looking for. Your wording is fine, and set ups are fine too but focus on turning your decent concepts into good punchlines not just a bar about concept with no punch..you still win here, only because your concept was better. If 3bet had anything good he would have took it. Lol fuckin lucky sum bitch idk how you do it.

Vote: PAVILION O

[ILLunatic]

3bets punch was alright, didn't seem to hit as hard as I expected it to considering the set up.

Pavonia seemed more direct and wasn't that bad of a jab.

All in all, 3beta was going in e riht direction but I felt he dropped the ball and Pav slipped in with a slight jab that was just enough to steal the win.

Vote - Pavonia

[Meks.]

Back in THE daze, wins you this battle prolly, the reference would've fit a lot better, pav a rottie was cool wp, it connected decent, both punches were cool, nothing crazy, going with 3bet on this one.

[Fresh]

3Bet was ok here. decent nameplay with an ok flip and one I haven't seen before.

Pav back in a daze / back in the days is little bit forced and this concept plaed as fuck too. Thought u coulda brought more to the table here.

v/Bet

[Joe Boston]

I felt 3 bet had a creative nameplay punch good reference different. Pav your reference was pretty played.

V/3 Bet