lmao @ learn math, coming from you to me. this is gonna end up like all our arguments, me understanding your point but disagreeing, and you just blatantly not understanding my point, lmao.
if we have more battles then there'll be more than 16 heads during the week even if by the end of the week it is back to 16. So that's going against your own instructions.
We will do exactly what you are saying NEXT WEEK. Bottom 4 will be in do or dies and 4 signins will face them
this week COM's sorting out battles anyway. If you still dont see what I'm saying, sort it out with him
it doesnt really matter to me. imma win my do or die match and not be in one next week.
btw, i posted early cuz i know ill be too busy this week to drop later.
...with the difference that the losers from this week are booted end of this week so there'll always be 16 heads even during the middle of the week, and not more than 8 battlesOriginally Posted by Vaskez
HW Title: Philly 7-0 vs. ...?... 6-2
HW Contender: Defcon 5 5-2 vs. PhuQue 3-5
Coop 4-4 vs. Untold 4-4
Keyed Alife 2-1 vs. Ancel 2-1
Tony B 3-3 vs. Nick James 1-0
Com 4-5 vs. Cry 1-0
Do or Die: Eddie 1-0 vs. Rule. 7-1
Do or Die: Plagarism 1-5 vs. J.Hens 6-1
Do or Die: Warming 0-1 vs. ..Starscream! 4-2
Do or Die: Qualm 0-1 vs. $pitacular 1-4
that's how the matches should've been...you see what I'm saying? 4 signed up...they battle the bottom 4 for their spots...whoever wins stays in the league...by the end of the week there's still a 16 head roster...it wont effect playoffs or anything...all it does is give people that are doing bad in the league a chance to lose and leave...and it keeps people that are doing ok from being in do or die matches for no reason
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
the entire point of my idea is that why would you put people in do or die matches to let other people take their place (that may not even do as good as the ones in the do or die match) the next week, best way to go about that is to let them personally battle for their spot instead of just hopping in the league with no problem because someone else lost the week before that is probably better than them
o man if me n def win ima b pissed we gotta battle AGAIN AFTER A WEEK
I KNOW that's what you're saying, but that's not how me and COM interpreted it 2 weeks ago when we made all the rules and stuff.
Look, I dont really care, but then that changes everything again, then that'd mean 9 battles to vote on etc. wait to see what COM says and to see if he wants to reset battles etc.
either way the signin thread clearly said week 11 - why didnt you say something a week ago to change that?
yeah I Know it sucks, but that's what happens when you base matches on rankings. Well, we'll see.
the amount of battles will probably change weekly...which is why I thought the vote on every battle idea wasn't too good..lol
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
i see the point in smokas idea in havin to beat someone in LLL for their spot rather than 4 of us facing other 4 members in the league.
but vaskez's idea could work for this week and we'll go into rotation as you said, smoka, starting next week like vaskez orginally planned. next week will be the quality we've been lookin for with spit and hens anyways.
both ideas have advantages. But yeah, if there are varying numbers of battles each week I disagree on the vote on every battles rule as well.
Yeah, why change it now? Let us finish out this week like this and change next week.
well technically this week JUST started...if Nick didn't post his verse already I'd throw a bitch fit to get it fixed but it's too late now...I just wanted to make sure we were all on the same page now
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
actually, just realised, Def and Chrit just came off losses, they cant be contendors
Posting Rules
