(1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
Due Dates
Matches set Sunday night.
Check-Ins due Tuesday midnight
Punches due Thursday midnight
Voting concludes Sunday 9pm
(all times pacific)
Voting
Everyone is required to vote on EVERY battle.
1 vote deduction for every battle link missed.
Failure to meet quota results in 1 week boot.
Failure to meet voting quota twice times results in 2 week boot.
Failure to meet voting quota 3 times results in boot remainder of season/playoffs.
Only votes from 1-2 Punch season 23 participants will count.
Non 1-2 punch votes will be allowed as feedback but will not count towards final tally.
Example of an acceptable vote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nahlidge
Smog n Let in the finals ? Someone loan a punch cos these cats really need one.
I'll hit these faggots w/ so many fly kicks - the new Jordan's 6's'll have a nation wide refund.
-I thought this was cool, at first I thought it was a reach with the punch/kick reference. But I think the Jordan 6/finals reference was cool. I just think the wordin' on this was pretty bad.
Smog wears the pants. He maid ill his bitch but chances of offspring are kinda slim
Unless he wants to see decrease in his genes...every night when Kay's done ironing them
-Nice, I like the maid/bitch work slap that you hit kay with lol. but I don't think you really dissed smog. you kinda big upped him lol.
These faggot fucks ain't felt, it's obvious along the ways some massive luck was dealt...
When all it takes is knuckles to silence letter K.... or anybody tryna grab or touch my belt...
-I think you shoulda spelled out Kay, but other than that I thought this was nice.
I think smog got this. Kay had bad wording. So it was between Letterman and Smog to me. And Letterman didn't really diss Smog with his punch imo.
Vote - Smog
Example of an Unacceptable vote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miracle
v/kid
i thought letter was choppy.. n smogs bar got little choppy toward the end..with saying 'or' twice
Battle Rules
Punches must be dropped AFTER both participants check in.
Failure to check in on time will result in loss and battler will be replaced in the battle.
NO EXTENSIONS. It's only 1 bar.
NO editing punches after your opponent drops
Biting will result is league/site ban.
Recycling will result in DQ and league ban.
@Letterman
@Meks.
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks
Hey, is your fuckin nose gonna give your ego enough space to check in?
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks
Lol I get to kill you in 2 leagues this season?
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks
Almost forgot all about this shit, doesn't matter, cuz ur bar is sure to be geeky as hell
And I'm not gonna say SHIT about what I think of ur skills.... Cuz this total lack of effort should simply speak for itself
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks
I give this footlong to ur girl. She says ur a dub in bed
Cuz anytime you try to slider meat, she just asks for a sub instead
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
Meks posted bullshit for the sake of showing and put absolutely zero effort into the punch.
Letterman did essentially the same, but actually had some humor to it which made it hit harder than I was expecting.
Overall better attempt, I see Letterman taking this in a landslide.
Vote - Letterman
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
Meks- iono. I kinda liked it
Seemed stretched but it was direct n swaggerishin approach. But u pretty much said ur not trying. Ok but eh
Decent
Letterman..I see the wp
Problem is what do sliders hAve to d O w/ subs
Sliders are Krystal burgers. The concept in itself was weird.
Seemed like u created the wp n went out of ur way to make that shit work w/ the moitst unrelated tie in imaginable. You tried to slider meat but she just asked for a sub. Most notably. .Ur footlong? Ehhh...Ok I guess
I think I got meks by a hair
Think letterman concept other 5han the wp was fuxd
V/meks
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
not feeling either punch tbh.
Meks stated in his punch he put no effort in and based his concept around that smh and it was stretched as fuck AGAIN
Letterman had a slider wp tied in with a sub sandwich wtf lol. Not to mention "he's a dub in bed" wouldn't that mean he's a win? To dub someone is to title them or w/e so that doesn't work either.
I dunno this is a tough one to call.
I've gotta go w/ mekss for at least being direct whereas letterman was all over the place with his and was forcing the shit outta his tie ins.
v/Meks
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
Mex:
Good Concept imo. But again it came off as longwinded. What do you do audio or some shit?
Letterman:
Ur shit was dope imo. Simple yet effective. Setup tied into the punch well. Good shit
vote letters
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
Meks - yeah man yours was hella stretched snd your concept was weak, didn't really hit.
Lettmer - your wordplay has been used plenty of times but at least your concept was better than Meks which gives you the win. Wording better too.
Vote: letterman
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
Meks stretched finished and just felt the punch itself had no sting factor. Letterman good humor factor off the wordplay flip.
V/Letterman
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
ehh, I didnt like either tbh
meks just completely fell flat w/ almost no attempt at being witty
letter had some wit but also fell flat, corny way of executing the diss
I think I'ma go w/ letter for putting a little bit more effort in
v/letterman
Re: (1-2)Letterman vs (1-2)Meks[Open For Votes]
Wasn't feeling meks bar kinda came across as audio based and statementish
Lettermans bar was predictable af soon as I read footlong, sub was sure to follow, not very creativite but beats meks tbh
Mvgr letterman