And honestly, I think giving 3pts for voting on ANY battle is a better idea... might even eliminate the need for putting a sticky on old battles, cuz hopefully with more points there will be more votes and less old battles.
Printable View
And honestly, I think giving 3pts for voting on ANY battle is a better idea... might even eliminate the need for putting a sticky on old battles, cuz hopefully with more points there will be more votes and less old battles.
Fuck y'all lame asses.
Fukq
Yall nerds are whats wrong with life. You should all eat yourselves.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Lol @ telling a business management major about business. Obviously it would saturate the points, thats when u charge more for whatever the points can buy you (im assuming u can spend them like currency somewhere otherwise points are 'pointless' lol). Classic inflation... but u do it on the low, so people will think theyre getting more points and wont know prices have raised until they go to spend them. Haha.
and again, I see what ur saying about the old battles, but unless theres like 2 or 3 month old battles then people will vote on whats there due to the incentive. (Or assumed incentive lol). Thus, hopefully, eliminating "old battles" altogether (eventually), as battles will start to receive votes right when theyre done due to higher point rates.....
no? Lol
Hey your southern dream beat sounds an awful lot like this beat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWi_DZG0fXg
Not saying you stole it, just theres a noticeable similarity