So N. Korea wants some....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Paradox

wtf @ using this analogy over and over. how in the fuck are u gonna compare some team in the NFC South to the United States of America? It's prolly the stupidest thing i've heard all day, because one The Falcons are a goddamn team, and two they don't provide you with freedom. I don't get this shit sometimes, America gives people freedom knowing damn well that some of those people are going to turn around and use that freedom to bash the ones who gave it to em in the first place!

I agree wit Spit on the Anti American thing. You saying you're not "Pro-America" is just stupid coming from someone who's old enough to get the fuck out of America

---

pardon me for interrupting a discussion in which i am not taking part... but how the fuck can you challenge such an obvious analogy? he used a simple analogy...which made his point... what more do you want?

I am just dumbfounded as to how you can even challenge something so obvious... go here

www.dictionary.com
type in "analogy"

I think you will find that an analogy is a comparison between two different things that have similarities... which is why SMZ can "compare some team in the NFC South to the United States of America"

because he isnt saying the TEAM is similar to America, he is saying the concept of being able to be indifferent & unbiased is similar in both. god damn u cant possibly be so stupid that u don't grasp that...

this isnt the new xbox 360 shooter?

SMZ I do see your point, I'm not that blind to reality.

and sometimes I think patriotism does get in the way of doing right.. unfortunately doing wrong, and doing it FIRST, seems to be the only way to rule in this fucked up world.. so sometimes you gotta do a little wrong to do right in the long run.. and you can't possibly say there's any country out there better to live in as far as personal freedoms and general morality.. and this was all about North Korea not having nukes... not about the US and it's past history.. the world sees Kim as a threat.. hell, any guy named Kim should be shot anyway lol.. but the fact of the matter is, I do think the US should have nukes. I do. Without them, there's nothing to stop these third world country dictators from trying to start some pointless war that's going to get many people killed. That is why I view our nukes as a deterrent. These countries that don't have nukes... they're not trying to develop them as a deterrent (though they might claim that) they're tryin to gain some foothold to blackmail the world for shit they didn't earn. These dictators spend millions, no billions, of dollars on their own luxury and comfort while their people starve.. so now they want to bolackmail the rest of us into getting them more money (i.e. lift sanctions, ect) for their "starving people"

well FUCK them. that's how I feel.

cool, peace out. we won't miss you. and I BET you're gonna wait until there's a draft, then your pussy ass'll move huh bitch?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oneness

yea i probabley would move if their was a draft, only a fool would drop all his morals to fight a war he doesnt even support just cause someone is trying to force you into it. my morals come before any countrys wars. if there is a god that judges people last thing i want to do is say "yea iw as killing thousands of people i dont know or have aproblemw ith but come on it was for my country come on..." sorry if im not into ruining peoples lifes thats not my thing. i have zero obligation to this country or any other country. if doing what i think is right and wrong makes me a pussy i guess im apussy


but even if we werent involved in a war and we were in a complete moment of world peace id leave the first chance i got i dont like america, i hate a majority of americans to they are just like you. only thing keepign me here is id miss my family i dont have the money and lazyness to do anything

---

fuck you lazy bitch

people died so you could be lazy and have your gay opinions, and now you don't wanna do your share? get out now homo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by $pitacular

fuck you lazy bitch

people died so you could be lazy and have your gay opinions, and now you don't wanna do your share? get out now homo.

---

You idiot.

People don't go to wars so that other people can have their own opinions. They go to war for their own freedom, and sometimes they are forced to fight.

People like you give US a bad name because you think what you fight for IS freedom itself, instead of your own expression of freedom.

yeah and when the US falls someday those Canadian pussies will end up slaves. lol.

Canadians are already slaves :)

:coolio: canadians are our slaves duh

I bet Spit writes his text battles to country song beats.

lol

LOL at spits and paradox...



LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL... hahahah idiots.

Korea...well I think that the whole nuclear testing and weapons are not in violation of any rules, since each country is based on their own laws....Though other countries, like the U.S. is against it, we are not prepared to do anything drastic about it..unless our war-happy president wants to get involved and then there will be somethin outta nothin....and all hell will break loose....obviously other countries are not in favor of the nuclear weapons, but what can they do about it? I agree with what someone said before, korea is an isolated country and they don't really pay attention to the outside, but since they have all of this technology and all of these people, they have great potential to do damage to anything they please and I think that intimidates everyone else...basically we're just afraid of what may happen because of these nuclear weapons...and who knows, what if someone in a neighboring country figures out "how" to build one of these weapons, and then sells it off to some terrorist?? The consequences are endless, so to me, when bush was out looking for "weapons of mass destruction" he shoulda went over to the east side of the world, they were the ones who had the real potential to do it...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Paradox

i didn't say it was just goin to take a division, i said that would be the immediate threat for them. it's not like we'd have to sit here and send in small Special Forces groups to react immediately, u could pull a couple Infantry Battaltions from South Korea and impose your presence.


and yes there was a reason we didn't win the first time troops didn't kno what the fuck they were doing in terms of scrutinizing the enemy from the guys they

were helping.

---

Get it right. They need a lot more than a couple infantry battalions.

Squad - 9 to 10 soldiers. Typically commanded by a sergeant or staff sergeant, a squad or section is the smallest element in the Army structure, and its size is dependent on its function.

Platoon - 16 to 44 soldiers. A platoon is led by a lieutenant with an NCO as second in command, and consists of two to four squads or sections.

Company - 62 to 190 soldiers. Three to five platoons form a company, which is commanded by a captain with a first sergeant as the commander's principle NCO assistant. An artillery unit of equivalent size is called a battery, and a comparable armored or air cavalry unit is called a troop.

Battalion - 300 to 1,000 soldiers. Four to six companies make up a battalion, which is normally commanded by a lieutenant colonel with a command sergeant major as principle NCO assistant. A battalion is capable of independent operations of limited duration and scope. An armored or air cavalry unit of equivalent size is called a squadron.

Brigade - 3,000 to 5,000 solders. A brigade headquarters commands the tactical operation of two to five organic or attached combat battalions. Normally commanded by a colonel with a command sergeant major as senior NCO, brigades are employed on independent or semi-independent operations. Armored cavalry, ranger and special forces units this size are categorized as regiments or groups.

Division - 10,000 to 15,000 soldiers. Usually consisting of three brigade-sized elements and commanded by a major general, divisions are numbered and assigned missions based on their structures. The division performs major tactical operations for the corps and can conduct sustained battles and engagements.

Corps - 20,000 to 45,000 soldiers. Two to five divisions constitute a corps, which is typically commanded by a lieutenant general. As the deployable level of command required to synchronize and sustain combat operations, the corps provides the framework for multi-national operations.

Army - 50,000 + soliders. Typically commanded by a lieutenant general or higher, an army combines two or more corps. A theater army is the ranking Army component in a unified command, and it has operational and support responsibilities that are assigned by the theater commander in chief. The commander in chief and theater army commander may order formation of a field army to direct operations of assigned corps and divisions. An army group plans and directs campaigns in a theater, and is composed of two or more field armies under a designated commander. Army groups have not been employed by the Army since World War II.

damn somebody did their research