I agree, however peep Barcotic do the usual Barcotic in the UBC chat thread when he posted bullshit like that and I DQ'd him for doing so. And King co-signed his bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Knight
Equal opportunity.
Printable View
I agree, however peep Barcotic do the usual Barcotic in the UBC chat thread when he posted bullshit like that and I DQ'd him for doing so. And King co-signed his bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Knight
Equal opportunity.
I think its shitty that one competitor has the upper hand over the other.
Like all i have to do is no show, and my opponent loses out on a medal? How is that loophole still a thing? Its clearly open to exploitation.
GrimmReaperZ is in the champ match for 1-2. If i didnt like him, i could just not show? Then its just fk him? Fk what he wrote? Fk who he beat to get there?
Thats lame af
Facts
I thought that bar was slick, good battle JEM! our battle is closer than what the votes indicate imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by JEM.
and pleth should get the belt! can't fault someone who did everything he is supposed to just cause the other guy doesn't want to or can't show.
It's like an interim title, lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy
straight up!! agree with this 100%Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy
if yall wanna go by the same technicalities u morons are going by, king only dropped 8 lines according to @Amen 's verse standards bc it didnt rhyme... 8 lines=under the limit
=a no show
=an actual battle pleth vs grimm for the VACANT belt
i rest my case
- - - Updated - - -
no, wtfQuote:
Originally Posted by Greedy
he would battle for it the following wk, genius
how its allllways been, bc thats the proper way
- - - Updated - - -
@Meth ^
making sure u see this & apply properly
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcotic
12 out of 14 of the "Lines" rhyme. According to your logic and everyone of your dick riders who co-signed you in UBC - you allegedly met the line requirement - so as you complained and so did King, he met it as well in this battle - HENCE it's not a no show.Quote:
[1]thinking ur not gonna show
[2]n this battle is a no go
[3]wtf
[4]pleth with the duck
[5]cant compete
[6]ur fucking weak
[7]bout to smoke
[8]ur a joke
[9]bars bars bars
[10]leave u with scars
[11]fucking 14 line min
[12]12 more than i need for him
[13]and this last one wont rhyme
[14]coz fuck amen
- - - Updated - - -
Lol @ 8 lines under the line limit. Barcotic is legit trolling now.
pleth v grimm for the VACANT belt
- - - Updated - - -
@Meth
Oh and by the way, 6 of your lines = 1 statement that wasn't even an insult. His bars are different statements with some 1, 2 buckle my shoe rhyme and insults.
Difference.
Keep trying to argue the fact that King no showed and contradicting your faggot self further.
My nigga thats lame af. What was this week then? Just a waste of concepts/time/etc? Thats a steep price to pay because ur opponent didnt do his part.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcotic
This man should not be penalized because his opponent couldnt be bothered to write averse.
Plus yall saying its a bitch move on Plethora part. Gtfoh. That man upheld his part of the bargain
ps. i have no dickriders
im hated
just bc U legit retarded...
No VACANT title, fuck off.
Pleth won it fair and square. Thanks to @Barcotic for setting the faggot standard with his usual faggot antics in the UBC.
You're welcome.
its always been this way @Greedy
whats lame would be winning a title against a no show verse
winning it vs an ACTUAL verse next wk vs grimm is LEGIT
and something u can actually talk about after lol
OH, and I told King to post a verse yesterday and waied till about 3PM when I left my office and nothing.
So again, fuck you - Michael. Fuck you and your Camo Jeggings.
You pussy.