Printable View
maybe you should fucking read what I wrote before you group me into your irrelevant rebuttle. I said i never thought u used my style. i could care less if you have or haven't, i just figured since I stumbled across the post I would 'actually defend' that fact.
I can't believe i apparently registered on here in '04 and exhausted my first post breaking down your topical followed by semi-defending the fact that you didn't jack my style lol
Now, now...
Someone's gonna start crying.
You legendary textcees, you.
You didn't come into this thread because you were interested in reading anything I wrote. You came into this thread because either:Quote:
Originally Posted by namixx
1) You searched your name to see what would come up
2) Baron Mynd mentioned me 'using your style'.
Otherwise, I would've never known you were registered to this site. I just find it mad disrespectful that out of all the years of my writing that when I'm about to finish...someone comes in and tells me I'm taking someone's style. I didn't knock your critique Namix, I knocked your reason behind it.
sista, of course i searched my name to come across your thread.. I still don't even know what forum I am posting in.. i think that is blantant to pretty much everyone..Quote:
Originally Posted by .Nique.
but anyway, does it really matter whatever you think my 'intentions' were behind givin you a very sincere and specific breakdown? I reallly just figured since, as previously stated, i came across the thread, I would try to add some value to it...i don't understand what you mean by 'reasons behind it' lol... I could have just come in and said 'yes, you jacked my style', or even 'no you did not jack my style'... but first and foremost, i broke down the good read you delivered...
s'like i give you the time of the day and you only show the time of the month... one way or the other, i wouldn't have broken down a shitty ass verse just because my name was in the thread...the topic was over generalized, but you hit the nail on the head as far as an over-generalized topic goes... t'was a good read....and a great last read pending your unpredictable reactions to an altruistic attempt at some feed back..
Rofl, Namix - its Baron!Quote:
Originally Posted by namixx
'She' doesnt really write like you in THIS piece, but I read something 'she' did that started with "The mutiny of scrutiny..." or something, and that just smacked of the Namix/B-Boys style. Im not saying that was a bad thing mind, I actually preferred 'her' when 'she' wrote like that ..
Nique - you took my comments waaaaaaaaaay overboard. I wasnt trying to be an asshole at all with what I said here, I just gave my genuine opinion. Stop with the world-against-me attitude, its really not THAT serious. Lol. I was just trying to give you a bit of honest critique, I even said that I enjoyed the piece so where this "Mutiny of scrutiny" came from ive no idea! :^) Anyhow, as a means of extending the olive branch so to speak - hows about a collab sometime?
You can get me on: camarac@3mail.com
Pz!
Alright Niq, this is the first Ive read from you, actually, the first Ive read from anyone on this site. And this definatly passes as dope. Or rather, close to it. The concept here was nice, not used alot from what Ive read in my lifetime so that makes it an interesting read. You really grasped this concept, you took advantage of the facts you know, life expierence, everything you can really uphold in this. It was a heartfelt peice in my opinion, I felt like you put alot of effort in this, and if not effort, Id say emotion, and you did a damn good job on letting the reader know. Flow, all that, was nice, short and sweet, lots of multies, which is hard to do, but you pulled it off. Good job indeed.
Anyway, overall, this was nice, the emotion, the flow, the concept, everything was pretty much on point. Really an overall great job on your part. Keep it up, I look forward to reading more from you.
Check out my peice. Thanks.