Topical: TheUnderRated (I.J.L.) vs. Accelerate (Wits End)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ambitious

this was a decent battle.... good topic....
Under - liked your approach ... you were consistant with the topic... vocab was good and flow was ok, but ya lines were a little stretched.... still i felt.... u expressed everything well....imagry was nice and i liked the way u decided to present the apocolypse....good verse

Acc - nice verse from you too ... u took a different aproach than under did ... but i liked the story and u were consistant....u did kinda lose me at one point but otherwise it was ok... flow was good structure too ... imagry was nice ... and i liked the way u presented the topic too...good job

overall i think that the 2 diff. styles coliding here made for a good battle.... and both of you presented it in diff. ways so it was hard to choose.... since both stories were pretty good ...i'm voting Under for the vocab & description ... his verse was simply more intriging and i felt like it was the better one.
V/- under

http://rapbattles.com/forum/showthre...8&page=1&pp=15

---

word. . . .yo i think also that the fact that under had his vocab domonating other cats vocab was a plus i beleive n a topical battle bigger words mean bigger points,so yeah i liked ya concept of how ya presented ya verse under kinda sick style was dope n a sense but yea ya kno it was Aight to read
as for accelerate was kinda simple but had a nice overall lil verse but coulda cam more on the creative side and shit and under man fix ya structure up a lil more next time it was all over the place. . . .
vote/under. . . .hit my battle wit Rappad im getting D/R. . . .

ok i felt that demuirgic got this because i was feelin his flow and his vocab a lil bit better than accelerate

both had good verses...but i felt that d's verse amde me think more and made me get intot he topic more

accelerate had a good verse but i had myself readin lines over to get them....the creativity was there but it didnt make me think as much as d's verse did

this was a good topical battle ...but i think that d got it for better imagination and gettin into the verse more

v/ d

UNDER, very consistent on the topic with some niiiice vocab..the flow wasnt anything special, but wasnt the worst thing..imagiery was pretty nice too..

ACC, decent shit you know, you were consistent, your structure was better then unders and your flow, you presented the apocolypse pretty nice, although UNDER did also..

Its a close battle in my opinion, both of you have different styles, so like AMB said its hard to choose, but im going to go with AMB how he said vocab & descriptioon is what took it for UNDER, nice shit done by both of you though..

V/Under