LLL Season XXII Chat/Predictions/talk shit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

its always been this way @Greedy
whats lame would be winning a title against a no show verse

winning it vs an ACTUAL verse next wk vs grimm is LEGIT
and something u can actually talk about after lol

---

this
im not even addressing downs syndromes anymore

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

if yall wanna go by the same technicalities u morons are going by, king only dropped 8 lines according to @Amen 's verse standards bc it didnt rhyme... 8 lines=under the limit

=a no show

=an actual battle pleth vs grimm for the VACANT belt

i rest my case

- - - Updated - - -


no, wtf
he would battle for it the following wk, genius

how its allllways been, bc thats the proper way

- - - Updated - - -
@Meth ^
making sure u see this & apply properly

---

I've seen people advance to an LLL title match by 3 consecutive no shows. What if my next opponent don't show? Where does it end?

Y’all argue over the most pointless shit lol

Just give Pleth the dub and move on

it ends when u win a battle against a battle verse lolll

- - - Updated - - -

yes, pleth does get a dub
just not the belt

yet

He should take the belt too imo

- - - Updated - - -

So King is still champ and gets another champ match next week?

So what happens with Pleth

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

its always been this way @Greedy
whats lame would be winning a title against a no show verse

winning it vs an ACTUAL verse next wk vs grimm is LEGIT
and something u can actually talk about after lol

---

That man posted an ACTUAL verse THIS week. He upheld his part. His opponent reneged. Not him. Thats shady af.

And he did post a verse. Just like you did in UBC.
King met all the requirements needed for a verse. He even made sure it rhymed, to spite amen.


That rule need to change

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jit

Y’all argue over the most pointless shit lol

Just give Pleth the dub and move on

---

Its not pointless tbh. That shit lame af

by all means, make a paper champion

make somebody who didnt earn it the champ
do it wrong

idc

but u better hope he wins next wk vs an actual battle verse otherwise theres forever a big asterisk beside pleth's only LLL title run.....

yall dumb lol fr

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

this
im not even addressing downs syndromes anymore

---

Because you are wrong.

And it will not go down YOUR way, faggot. King showed. There are no double standards here. It's Kings fault and now one else. He took a gamble and it back fired, sucks to be him. You probably care more then he does, which is obviously why you are trying to argue some bullshit points that don't even make sense and contradict your faggotry.

Case Closed.

Battle is open for votes, now shut the fuck up and let the voting commence.

i already used asterisk wp btw

- - - Updated - - -

shut up amen, case closes when ur asshole does, dumb fgt

Yea let's penalize the man that actually TOOK THE TIME and dropped a legit verse and not the faggot who dropped a "NO SHOW" VERSE.

BARCOTIC, YOU ARE ONE LOSER FAGGOT, ON GOD.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

by all means, make a paper champion

make somebody who didnt earn it the champ
do it wrong

idc

but u better hope he wins next wk vs an actual battle verse otherwise theres forever a big asterisk beside pleth's only LLL title run.....

yall dumb lol fr

---

Thats not his problem. Thats a procedural issue tbh. That man did his part. The worst part is the nigga who actually did something wrong here gets off scott free. How do u penalize King? U cant. But plethora get the shitty side of the stck.

I get thats the rule, but thats lame af

uhh
king gets a loss.. and signed out

lmao smoke some more

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greedy

Thats not his problem. Thats a procedural issue tbh. That man did his part. The worst part is the nigga who actually did something wrong here gets off scott free. How do u penalize King? U cant. But plethora get the shitty side of the stck.

I get thats the rule, but thats lame af

---

He's fucking retarded. The rule is regarding NO SHOW. A "No Show verse" is NOT A FUCKING NO SHOW. King showed, like it or not. He willingly typed a bunch of bullshit that rhymed ASSUMING pleth was no showing. Not pleth's problem, barc can eat a bag of live aids dicks, tbr.

It's black and white.

and pleth gets a free win too
just not a free belt ON TOP of that

lol

He gets the belt. You can cry about it all you want. Battle is open for votes. pleth will win and become new LLL champ.

Cry about it.

@King posted a legit verse.
If plethora dont get his medal, @Barcotic need another loss on his record for no showing in the ubc. Because a dbl L is THE RULES when u noshow an amen ran tournament. And that's ALWAYS been the CASE

meth, run the league properly dog

or how u want, but dont listen to that woman amen

this a crime scene, high beam blast this bastard Bar
gonna see white sheets go over this clown like his avatar

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by plethora

this a crime scene, high beam blast this bastard Bar
gonna see white sheets go over this clown like his avatar

---

I mean. Niggas got u wasting bars anyway.

King sitting back enjoying his popcorn listening to all y’all defend him

- - - Updated - - -

Wait the only one defending King is bar

I’m dumb fr

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greedy

I think its shitty that one competitor has the upper hand over the other.

Like all i have to do is no show, and my opponent loses out on a medal? How is that loophole still a thing? Its clearly open to exploitation.

GrimmReaperZ is in the champ match for 1-2. If i didnt like him, i could just not show? Then its just fk him? Fk what he wrote? Fk who he beat to get there?

Thats lame af

---

100% truth....as a champ or contender, u kinda know who ur next opponent will be, so u kinda even have a longer period to start writing... so a no show verse is actually extremely lazy... I'd say if pleth wants it, give him the belt... if its to be vacated, then have pleth battle whoever is the next contender and keep it pushing gentlemen

Lol Barc think Meth going to agree with him.

Fucking legit retard.

- - - Updated - - -

Best believe, Pleth gets fucked out of LLL accomp - Barc getting 2 L’s for no showing UBC.

Thats on god.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amen

Lol Barc think Meth going to agree with him.

Fucking legit retard.

- - - Updated - - -

Best believe, Pleth gets fucked out of LLL accomp - Barc getting 2 L’s for no showing UBC.

Thats on god.

---

Exactly.

Honestly I don't think Barcotic understands basic logic.

It's GOP level collaborated retardery in here, sometimes.

I mean, yall do what yall do. Rules are rules.

But best believe, ill be in here to represent the falsely accused.

#freePlethora

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greedy

I mean, yall do what yall do. Rules are rules.

But best believe, ill be in here to represent the falsely accused.

#freePlethora

---

Petition to change my name to #freePlethora

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by High And Drunk

Honestly I don't think Barcotic understands basic logic.

It's GOP level collaborated retardery in here, sometimes.

---

Its the exact argument he was arguing FOR a few wks ago. But now its "le rules"
@Meth change that rule bro.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greedy

Its the exact argument he was arguing FOR a few wks ago. But now its "le rules"
@Meth change that rule bro.

---

He is such a fucking baby.

I've said this before and people were like "shuttup he is text famous."

This dude legit just agrees with or disagrees with whatever is in his best interests and thinks he is smarter than everyone else in the room, because of it.

I don't get people who don't at least check themselves by real world standards.

- - - Updated - - -

The argument he's trying to make is that winning v no show is worse than winning next week.

.. But that's retarded logic.

K = Champ

P = Challenger

K v P (no show)

Outcome 1 - K wins

done

Outcome 2 - P wins

done

Outcome 3 - K no shows

a. K stays champ

K v P next week

3a is potentially recursive. Therefore it is a shitty solution.

b. P becomes champ

done

Outcome 4 - P no shows

a. K wins

done

b. Repeat next week

potentially recursive


Both of the delay options are potentially recursive. Therefore, they can and will be exploited. LIKE FUCKING BARC NOT BATTLING TILL PLAYOFFS TO PROTECT HIS SHOT

The only non exploitable outcomes are to stick to basic rules --- you no show, you lose. Period.


As for trying to qualify King's verse no show or not......


... Fuck, I can't believe I have to spell this out:

1. King is no show

King loses

2. King is not no show

King loses

... because his fucking verse sucked.




Barc is literally retarded, will read this and be like "yeah but my feelings."

I'm requesting permission to post.

Yea fire champ match

@Amen you just condradicted yourself nigga

god damn.


first of all, i didn't have a verse. he checked mad late i didnt think he was showing at first then i didnt have time over the weekend. i dropped the no show verse coz i had a chance to check the thread around midnight my time and he still hadn't dropped so i just threw it up so it wasnt a double ns.

so since i did drop a verse that would have got a win if he didnt show, technically he should get the champ imo. technically.

that being said, theres two types of people. the ones who would accept that accomp, and the ones that wouldnt. personally i wouldnt but to each his own

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by plethora

I get what ur saying but u also gotta ask urself.. Would he have beaten the verse I posted??

---

and i know this bullshit was a troll.

- - - Updated - - -

fucking frontlines superstar talking about would i have beaten his verse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by High And Drunk

He is such a fucking baby.

I've said this before and people were like "shuttup he is text famous."

This dude legit just agrees with or disagrees with whatever is in his best interests and thinks he is smarter than everyone else in the room, because of it.

I don't get people who don't at least check themselves by real world standards.

- - - Updated - - -

The argument he's trying to make is that winning v no show is worse than winning next week.

.. But that's retarded logic.

K = Champ

P = Challenger

K v P (no show)

Outcome 1 - K wins

done

Outcome 2 - P wins

done

Outcome 3 - K no shows

a. K stays champ

K v P next week

3a is potentially recursive. Therefore it is a shitty solution.

b. P becomes champ

done

Outcome 4 - P no shows

a. K wins

done

b. Repeat next week

potentially recursive


Both of the delay options are potentially recursive. Therefore, they can and will be exploited. LIKE FUCKING BARC NOT BATTLING TILL PLAYOFFS TO PROTECT HIS SHOT

The only non exploitable outcomes are to stick to basic rules --- you no show, you lose. Period.


As for trying to qualify King's verse no show or not......


... Fuck, I can't believe I have to spell this out:

1. King is no show

King loses

2. King is not no show

King loses

... because his fucking verse sucked.




Barc is literally retarded, will read this and be like "yeah but my feelings."

---

Dead.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by King

god damn.


first of all, i didn't have a verse. he checked mad late i didnt think he was showing at first then i didnt have time over the weekend. i dropped the no show verse coz i had a chance to check the thread around midnight my time and he still hadn't dropped so i just threw it up so it wasnt a double ns.

so since i did drop a verse that would have got a win if he didnt show, technically he should get the champ imo. technically.

that being said, theres two types of people. the ones who would accept that accomp, and the ones that wouldnt. personally i wouldnt but to each his own





and i know this bullshit was a troll.

- - - Updated - - -

fucking frontlines superstar talking about would i have beaten his verse.

---

Nigga barcotic told u I post last minute and I checked in on Friday morning to ask for an extension

i'm aware. thats y i said i didnt think u were showing "at first". didnt have time to write after u checked.

i got time tonight tho...u want to post the verse in fl due tonight for ur FL champ?

Smh y’all had a week to write. Check in or not we went over this last week be prepared

The fuck

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by King

i'm aware. thats y i said i didnt think u were showing "at first". didnt have time to write after u checked.

i got time tonight tho...u want to post the verse in fl due tonight for ur FL champ?

---

That's up to the FL mod but I'm down

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Caged

@Amen you just condradicted yourself nigga

---

Shut the fuck up.

Show me where I allegedly contradicted myself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by King

i'm aware. thats y i said i didnt think u were showing "at first". didnt have time to write after u checked.

i got time tonight tho...u want to post the verse in fl due tonight for ur FL champ?

---

Thats not how its going to work... going to run a small tourney in a week and get a ranking system set up

FWIW I like @King and his stuff.

Dude just gotta always post. @Meth taught me that shit.