LLL Season XXII Chat/Predictions/talk shit

nope, last bar didnt rhyme!

lol amen ur dumb yo
he couldve put 1-10 & its the saaame shit

Here this idiot goes...

Ok, Michael. Your opinion isn't going to save him here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by plethora

So how does this work.. Can't win a title via no show but king technically posted a verse

---

nah dude, u win that shit next wk (if u win next wk)
king is out w/ injury

have a little pride

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amen

Here this idiot goes...

Ok, Michael. Your opinion isn't going to save him here.

---

save who exactly? lmao ur so stupid

Bullshit.

He won it this week. King technically showed according to you, right? Don't pull that double standard shit because it's your boyfriend and you guys have been texting together for 2 decades. Had it been anyone else, you'd be all for PLETH winning.

Stop the faggotry, man.

u cant win the belt off that, dude
gtfoh lol

Thats lame af. Cuz if plethora lose next wk he gets no medal/accomp, when he actually showed, and competed to the best of his ability. Should not be penalized.

ur the first guy to call posting numbers a no show

yet u see it legit someone winning the belt off some retard shit?

LOL thank God u dont run this league...

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greedy

Thats lame af. Cuz if plethora lose next wk he gets no medal/accomp, when he actually showed, and competed to the best of his ability. Should not be penalized.

---

if he lost next wk, chances are he wouldve lost this wk
meaning not getting an award is proper

butk, im off to work

if pleth actually WANTS to win like that, hes sad

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

u cant win the belt off that, dude
gtfoh lol

---

And you expected to WIN A ROUND AND MOVE FORWARD IN A TOURNEY?

man, shut the entire fuck up.

Yes the fuck he can win the belt. KING SHOWED. He posted 10 lines - AS YOU CRIED ABOUT. AND RHYMED.

Just stop - you are looking like a real bitch right now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

ur the first guy to call posting numbers a no show

yet u see it legit someone winning the belt off some retard shit?

LOL thank God u dont run this league...

- - - Updated - - -


if he lost next wk, chances are he wouldve lost this wk
meaning not getting an award is proper

butk, im off to work

if pleth actually WANTS to win like that, hes sad

---

U've no way to determine who'd win what battle. Thats purely speculative.

That rule is lame af.

He's trolling.

No way in life this nigga is that dumb.

Technically thats the rule. But its a garbage rule and should be changed

I agree.

I've never accepted 1-10 and always encouraged verses to be dropped.

Actual verses and not 1/2 word bars that rhyme. I always posted a verse - even when opponents did no show. I still posted something. Maybe have been the actual verse I did drop or sometimes I even went off of the top in Golden Glove format style verse but something was posted.

Difference between someone with work ethic and pride versus a lazy faggot with no work ethic and an ego.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amen

I agree.

I've never accepted 1-10 and always encouraged verses to be dropped.

Actual verses and not 1/2 word bars that rhyme. I always posted a verse - even when opponents did no show. I still posted something. Maybe have been the actual verse I did drop or sometimes I even went off of the top in Golden Glove format style verse but something was posted.

Difference between someone with work ethic and pride versus a lazy faggot with no work ethic and an ego.

---

You cant actually take shit Barc says seriously, right?

I mean, the guy is sitting out the rest of the season so he doesn't blow his "playoffs shot."

He consistently has double standards for his behavior and others.

And he has such a fragile fucking ego, he has no way to see the real world outside of himself.

His friend is gonna lose so he doesn't GAF about the rules.

Ignore him. Give Pleth the belt.

- - - Updated - - -

Also he is freeposting in a champ battle.

Yell at him, you fucking cowards.

Finally -- what's with the literal zero votes this week?

Sorry for the delay bros. Holidays coming up, has me extra busy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

nah dude, u win that shit next wk (if u win next wk)
king is out w/ injury

have a little pride

---

I get what ur saying but u also gotta ask urself.. Would he have beaten the verse I posted??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Caged

@GrimmReaperZ I edited one letter you fucking faggot

---

ok, now go edit your life....good luck

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by plethora

I get what ur saying but u also gotta ask urself.. Would he have beaten the verse I posted??

---

Fuck him. Not your fault KING didn't post a verse. I'm sure he didn't have one written either. He was hoping for you to no show and procrastinated and probably would have typed some shit up hours after he read your verse and posted.

Hey, GrimmZReaper? What do you say we have another battle? It'll be good, ya' know? If we sign up for this league.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

off a ns? mmmnot quite lol

---

He showed just like you allegedly did in UBC, right?

What changed?

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sinning

Hey, GrimmZReaper? What do you say we have another battle? It'll be good, ya' know? If we sign up for this league.

---

Hi Dagel.

lol @ Dagel

My JOB punchline is reference to a JOB punchline @Plaz dropped against Joe Boston. Clearing that up based on @High And Drunk only catching the Fat Joe reference.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sinning

Hey, GrimmZReaper? What do you say we have another battle? It'll be good, ya' know? If we sign up for this league.

---

im already signed up AJ... just sign up and eventually im sure we'll get a battle....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JEM.

My JOB punchline is reference to a JOB punchline @Plaz dropped against Joe Boston. Clearing that up based on @High And Drunk only catching the Fat Joe reference.

---

I appreciate that. Lemme go look at that again and see what it changes.

Looked at it. Still doesn't change how I feel about the punch.

Joe B being Joe Boston carries the same feel, for me, as Joe B being Joe B.

It's a little more clever than before. But I feel the same way about the punch, overall.

That said -- I do respect you putting up the mention and making me look at it again. I'm happy to check over stuff that anyone feels I missed.

I'm not trolling anyone. I lay out the way I feel and I want to be accurate about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amen

And you expected to WIN A ROUND AND MOVE FORWARD IN A TOURNEY?

man, shut the entire fuck up.

Yes the fuck he can win the belt. KING SHOWED. He posted 10 lines - AS YOU CRIED ABOUT. AND RHYMED.

Just stop - you are looking like a real bitch right now.

---

Nah winning the belt like that is retarded.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amen

I agree.

I've never accepted 1-10 and always encouraged verses to be dropped.

Actual verses and not 1/2 word bars that rhyme. I always posted a verse - even when opponents did no show. I still posted something. Maybe have been the actual verse I did drop or sometimes I even went off of the top in Golden Glove format style verse but something was posted.

Difference between someone with work ethic and pride versus a lazy faggot with no work ethic and an ego.

---

I though I changed the rule a long time ago somewhere that to get a win you got to post something other than a 10 count and your opponent has to check in or some shit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Allen Knight

Nah winning the belt like that is retarded.

---

I agree, however peep Barcotic do the usual Barcotic in the UBC chat thread when he posted bullshit like that and I DQ'd him for doing so. And King co-signed his bullshit.

Equal opportunity.

I think its shitty that one competitor has the upper hand over the other.

Like all i have to do is no show, and my opponent loses out on a medal? How is that loophole still a thing? Its clearly open to exploitation.

GrimmReaperZ is in the champ match for 1-2. If i didnt like him, i could just not show? Then its just fk him? Fk what he wrote? Fk who he beat to get there?

Thats lame af

Facts

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JEM.

My JOB punchline is reference to a JOB punchline @Plaz dropped against Joe Boston. Clearing that up based on @High And Drunk only catching the Fat Joe reference.

---

I thought that bar was slick, good battle JEM! our battle is closer than what the votes indicate imo.

and pleth should get the belt! can't fault someone who did everything he is supposed to just cause the other guy doesn't want to or can't show.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greedy

I think its shitty that one competitor has the upper hand over the other.

Like all i have to do is no show, and my opponent loses out on a medal? How is that loophole still a thing? Its clearly open to exploitation.

GrimmReaperZ is in the champ match for 1-2. If i didnt like him, i could just not show? Then its just fk him? Fk what he wrote? Fk who he beat to get there?

Thats lame af

---

It's like an interim title, lol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greedy

I think its shitty that one competitor has the upper hand over the other.

Like all i have to do is no show, and my opponent loses out on a medal? How is that loophole still a thing? Its clearly open to exploitation.

GrimmReaperZ is in the champ match for 1-2. If i didnt like him, i could just not show? Then its just fk him? Fk what he wrote? Fk who he beat to get there?

Thats lame af

---

straight up!! agree with this 100%

if yall wanna go by the same technicalities u morons are going by, king only dropped 8 lines according to @Amen 's verse standards bc it didnt rhyme... 8 lines=under the limit

=a no show

=an actual battle pleth vs grimm for the VACANT belt

i rest my case

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greedy

I think its shitty that one competitor has the upper hand over the other.

Like all i have to do is no show, and my opponent loses out on a medal? How is that loophole still a thing? Its clearly open to exploitation.

GrimmReaperZ is in the champ match for 1-2. If i didnt like him, i could just not show? Then its just fk him? Fk what he wrote? Fk who he beat to get there?

Thats lame af

---

no, wtf
he would battle for it the following wk, genius

how its allllways been, bc thats the proper way

- - - Updated - - -
@Meth ^
making sure u see this & apply properly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

if yall wanna go by the same technicalities u morons are going by, king only dropped 8 lines according to @Amen 's verse standards bc it didnt rhyme... 8 lines=under the limit

=a no show

=an actual battle pleth vs grimm for the VACANT belt

i rest my case

---

Quote:

---

[1]thinking ur not gonna show
[2]n this battle is a no go
[3]wtf
[4]pleth with the duck
[5]cant compete
[6]ur fucking weak
[7]bout to smoke
[8]ur a joke
[9]bars bars bars
[10]leave u with scars
[11]fucking 14 line min
[12]12 more than i need for him
[13]and this last one wont rhyme
[14]coz fuck amen

---

12 out of 14 of the "Lines" rhyme. According to your logic and everyone of your dick riders who co-signed you in UBC - you allegedly met the line requirement - so as you complained and so did King, he met it as well in this battle - HENCE it's not a no show.

- - - Updated - - -

Lol @ 8 lines under the line limit. Barcotic is legit trolling now.

pleth v grimm for the VACANT belt

- - - Updated - - -
@Meth

Oh and by the way, 6 of your lines = 1 statement that wasn't even an insult. His bars are different statements with some 1, 2 buckle my shoe rhyme and insults.

Difference.

Keep trying to argue the fact that King no showed and contradicting your faggot self further.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barcotic

if yall wanna go by the same technicalities u morons are going by, king only dropped 8 lines according to @Amen 's verse standards bc it didnt rhyme... 8 lines=under the limit

=a no show

=an actual battle pleth vs grimm for the VACANT belt

i rest my case

- - - Updated - - -


no, wtf
he would battle for it the following wk, genius

how its allllways been, bc thats the proper way

- - - Updated - - -
@Meth ^
making sure u see this & apply properly

---

My nigga thats lame af. What was this week then? Just a waste of concepts/time/etc? Thats a steep price to pay because ur opponent didnt do his part.
This man should not be penalized because his opponent couldnt be bothered to write averse.

Plus yall saying its a bitch move on Plethora part. Gtfoh. That man upheld his part of the bargain

ps. i have no dickriders
im hated

just bc U legit retarded...

No VACANT title, fuck off.

Pleth won it fair and square. Thanks to @Barcotic for setting the faggot standard with his usual faggot antics in the UBC.

You're welcome.

its always been this way @Greedy
whats lame would be winning a title against a no show verse

winning it vs an ACTUAL verse next wk vs grimm is LEGIT
and something u can actually talk about after lol

OH, and I told King to post a verse yesterday and waied till about 3PM when I left my office and nothing.

So again, fuck you - Michael. Fuck you and your Camo Jeggings.

You pussy.