Or Any Web Designs.
http://studio9webdesign.com
Refer Excal.
Peace.
Printable View
Or Any Web Designs.
http://studio9webdesign.com
Refer Excal.
Peace.
Yet another bunch of amateur's posing as real developers. If those are your buddies, tell them that they are morons and should learn how to properly develop a site before they start trying to get paid for developing sites.
Yeah, that work isn't top notch, did that "one of the best in the world" designers do the layout for that link? cause honestly, going off that as a first impression, ^ what he said.
The text work is pretty horrible on all layouts. Also design consistency is okay, but I really don't like how the header under the nav bar changes size with the different pages you click...
I just loked at the portfolio, and got redirected to fail-ville, i mean sure it's better then web 1.0 geocity crap, but the websites are cluttered as fuck and on first looks, the photoshop cutting / placement is pretty bad.
Keyword on the homepage of that site you linked "unique" somehow i'm just not seeing it, looks like anyother website designed, and as a company trying to promote their "unique" designs, well it's not a good look.
http://studio9webdesign.com/images/s...evelopment.jpg
hahaha, terrible. they added colour and made a shitty font, still look shitty... and also moved that gay looking twirley thing closer, then gayed it up even more.
It was a shit logo to begin with, you would have been better off changing the design all together.
have a look, http://studio9webdesign.com/branding.htm
these are not good logo's, the only one I would even consider buying is maybe that BnW one down the bottom with the tie.
I was talking about how the site was coded without looking around at the actual designs they are offering. Wow@ how shitty the designers are just WOW. The only decent looking images/icons around the site are ones that I recognize from collections and stocks from around the net. They are complete fucking jokes.
Oh word, I was thinking of looking at the code, but didn't get past the designs...
Damn, that coding is kinda annoying to look at, I don't like to lay mine out like that, looks lame and annoying to read. The coding looks like how the noob's in my internet design class do it. Just a block of text...
you can't see the code they used idiot... you only see the client side code.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mic Dareall
your one of them people that think they can view source and get spoon fed lol
those are bad designs but you can't really say its bad coding.
Are you a fucking moron? It is poor coding and I am talking about the html and javascript code you dumb fuck. I do web development for a living and have been for the last 5-6 years stupid ass, I know more about web development then you could ever wish to.
I cannot believe you actually think that you cannot code html,css and javascript poorly. You are a massive idiot.
I am not even talking about the way the code is laid out. Even ignoring the inline css and javascript, the site is just horribly coded. The damn dropdown menu is purely javascript when the same functionality could be handled with simple css. Now to anyone with javascript disabled the 'more' link does absolutely nothing, and those areas of the site are completely inaccessible. Not to mention the javascript used to flip background images in and out which can also be handled via simple CSS and would be more accessible. I mean shit, just look at the code for the dock and you can obviously see they do not know what they are doing, there are inline onclick event handlers defined for the 'li' elements that contain the linked images..lol That makes absolutely no sense, they will never be triggered. It seems like they probably just copy and pasted that code from somewhere without actually knowing what it did or what to edit. I mean I could go on and on, like the lack of SEO and yadda yadda. Just about everything on the site is horrid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Med's
And if you click on any of the sites from the portfolio, it just gets worse. Table based layouts, wow.
I have certificates through the major companies..including zend and w3cschools, which is the web standards, all you see on his site is design, you can't comment on his server side coding unless you are seeing it, you don't see the main javascript functionality to be able to say hey your coding sucks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mic Dareall
i don't consider html or css coding because that is baby shit.
what you just said in here made you look like a fool.
thats like looking at a page and saying your php code sucks when you see no php lmao
and javascript just extends functionality, if someone don't have it which is only like 9% of people online then it simply won't run the javascript.
Mic is gonna rape you..
there a web design company, not a SEO company
And I went to college for a computer science and computer engineering. Your petty 'certification' means shit to me junior. And LMFAO @ you can't see their javascript. You are a complete idiot. After saying that, I am telling you to stop responding to this thread or I am going to ban you for trolling. It is obvious that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diasick
And if you develop sites then you should know how to code in a proper SEO way or you are offering your customers a site that is completely worthless.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diasick
LMFAO, i give a shit about your college dude, a zend certification is more prestigious than any school you wasted your money on. you cannot see his javascript, only if your using a tool like firebug to inspect it, which isn't his javascript and only the default interpretation by the browser, all you see is the design which is a whole new subject, i responded cause what you just said made me laugh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mic Dareall
you only see the browsers javascript, you don't see his javascript unless u have his source code.
most of the professors at these dam schools have no idea what there talking about and don't know how to teach, if i was going to college it dam sure wouldn't be for web development
You dipshit, all his javscript files get included in the head of the html.. .ANyone with half a brain can copy the 'src' of the script tag into the address bar of the browser and see the javascript. Javascript is clientside, which means the browser has to see it, if the browser can see it then ANYONE CAN.
And even ignoring your idiocy with that, the most horrendous part of the javascript on that site is within the main html of the pages itself.
all you see is the embedded javascript link, you don't see the file itself, i mean it probably is bad coding by looking at the design but you really can't say that unless u wen't through the source code, if you can even say it then.
LMFAO@ you only see the browsers javascript. LMFAO LMFAO LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Diasick
NO, the javascript is from the server, the browsers execute the javascript. They do not create it. lMFAO, you have no clue how the internet even works and you are trying to talk shit. I swear I am about to bann you.
Let me show you real quick man, just to prove that you are a moron
no no no, you idiot, all browsers have standards of how they interpret languages, so when you inspect css or javascript you see there interpretation. they call people like you script kiddies lmao, think you getting spoon fed when you go to edit> view source
you realize how much of a secruity risk that would be if i could just go to a site and click view>source to see all there code?
http://studio9webdesign.com/js/prototype.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/js/f4a_js.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/js/swfobject.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/js/fisheye.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/js/desktopmanager.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/js/flash_detect_min.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/javascripts/application.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/javascripts/lightbox.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/javascripts/menucontents.js
http://studio9webdesign.com/javascripts/anylinkmenu.js
^All the external javascript files included on that site, again ANYONE CAN SEE THEM!
thats just markup, thats not functionality
the first link was just doing browser detections
and thats not actually raw javascript there using the prototype framework
Here is code I am about to upload to RB in an external file just to further prove it to you ...
This is what the file will contain...
Thats is what the javascript file will contain...Now give me to create an html file and include it and then show you that you can view what I wrote in the external javascript fileHTML Code:alert('you are a moron');
text string data can only be seen and its very limited, nothing that works with the server can be seen.
Here is the html file...
http://rapbattles.com/test123.html
Here is the javscript file included in the head of that document...
http://rapbattles.com/test.js
and again thats not raw javascript, its prototype which is a javascript framework
Do you not understand what clientside means? TO the server the javascript files are just text documents, the browsers read through the html documents see the script tags linking to external javascript files and then request the server for those javascript files. The server does nothing but send them as text documents, the javascript is executed BY THE BROWSER on each users machine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diasick
thats all i see, yea i see the alert but not the actual function
lol.. wtf are you even talking about? prototype is a javascript framework, correct. BUT IT IS WRITTEN IN JAVASCRIPT, which means it IS javascript. It cannot be anything else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diasick
you need to learn to read, some javascript talks to the server, especially when your integrating it with ajax. some people have valuable data in there javascript and for this reason you will not see functionality. what you see is the browsers interpretation, and they have data stored in JSON, which is encrypted where we cannot see it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mic Dareall
You see this line...Quote:
Originally Posted by Diasick
That is me including the javascript file, so the browser asks the server for a javascript file namded 'test.js' which resides in the same folder as the html file.HTML Code:<script type="text/javascript" src="test.js"></script>
u was talking as if it was Raw javascriptQuote:
Originally Posted by Mic Dareall
prototype is a old ass framework btw
jquery FTW
lol.. There is no such thing as raw javascript, it is either javascript or it isn't. I swear, you say one more dumb thing like this and Im just going to bann you.
that is text string, anything valuable is encrypted so when the browser calls it they give us there interpretation, if you store data with JSON most of the javascript will be encrypted when you get the source from the browser, i wouldn't judge his code from edit>view sourceQuote:
Originally Posted by Mic Dareall
*Waits for Mic to drop the "oops" bomb*
dude i could give a fuck if you ban me, if i wanted back on i would just re register and that would tell everyone i just won this debate that your obviously loosing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mic Dareall
raw javascript, is raw javascript, without the use of a framework like jquery or mootools, or the prototype one these guys are using
NO, it does not. Here let me take a different approach. Show me one credible reference that backs up this claim about data in javascript always being encrypted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diasick